HOLY CRAP!@#@ 20,000

[ME BIGGD01]

READ THE SIGNS :blink:

20,000 DEAD (http://www.reuters.com/printerFriendlyPopup.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=4047680)

[MR. SLiK]

my dad told me about this, this morning. Devastating.

[OUTLAWS high ping camper]

Very tragic......so many lives.

[ME BIGGD01]

i just read it reading the drudge report. that is alot of people and freaky.

with all the things going on around the world, i feel that all those stories of the world ending may be true. ir emember when i was a kid and some of my famliy members who were cristian would always tell me the signs before the antichrist was coming. pretty freaky stuff that always stuck in the back of my mind. if you turn on the news, you see all the signs that were explained to me when i was a kid. storms, earth quakes, diseases, wars, airplane crashes. i brought this up a few weeks ago to someone and he said that we have always had these disasters but i beg to differ. no way in our history has so much crap been happening.

at this tim i shall play REM's "It's the end of the world as we know it---and i feel fine" :rolleyes:

[Dan2]

Tragic. When major faultlines are heavily populated this seems inevitable. :(

[Dark Reign]

Originally posted by OUTLAWS Dan2@Dec 27 2003, 06:43 AM
Tragic. When major faultlines are heavily populated this seems inevitable. :(
Especially in the third-world countries. :(

[Dangerous Dan]

Originally posted by ME BIGGD01@Dec 27 2003, 06:38 AM
i just read it reading the drudge report. that is alot of people and freaky.

with all the things going on around the world, i feel that all those stories of the world ending may be true. ir emember when i was a kid and some of my famliy members who were cristian would always tell me the signs before the antichrist was coming. pretty freaky stuff that always stuck in the back of my mind. if you turn on the news, you see all the signs that were explained to me when i was a kid. storms, earth quakes, diseases, wars, airplane crashes. i brought this up a few weeks ago to someone and he said that we have always had these disasters but i beg to differ. no way in our history has so much crap been happening.

at this tim i shall play REM's "It's the end of the world as we know it---and i feel fine" :rolleyes:
i agree, it's only 2004, so that gives 6 years of things to get worse and worse.... i think it'll end with a climactic asteroid hitting the planet... then there was that guy who claimed to be a time travelled, i forgte the name, but he claimed in his brief time here that there would be a civil war in the USA around 2008 or somehting, seems like the world could deteriorate into that at this rate :S

[Dangerous Dan]

i wanted to live a full life... lucky old guys :bawling:

[EXEcution]

Originally posted by Dark Reign+Dec 27 2003, 02:47 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Dark Reign &#064; Dec 27 2003, 02:47 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-OUTLAWS Dan2@Dec 27 2003, 06:43 AM
Tragic. When major faultlines are heavily populated this seems inevitable. :(
Especially in the third-world countries. :( [/b][/quote]
You mean "developing countries".
And yes it&#39;s very sad so mnay had to lose their lives.

[Dark Reign]

Originally posted by DaRkAgent+Dec 27 2003, 01:30 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (DaRkAgent &#064; Dec 27 2003, 01:30 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by Dark Reign@Dec 27 2003, 02:47 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-OUTLAWS Dan2@Dec 27 2003, 06:43 AM
Tragic. When major faultlines are heavily populated this seems inevitable. :(
Especially in the third-world countries. :(
You mean "developing countries".
And yes it&#39;s very sad so mnay had to lose their lives. [/b][/quote]
No. I mean third-world countries.
You can call them "developing" countries if you want, but that doesn&#39;t change the fact that their still poor. :rolleyes:

[MANSON]

Nostradameus.. ( not sure if I spelled that right?) predicted something bad would happen in New York in 1999...well we all know what happened to New York. He was just a few years off. He predicted a lot of things that have happend that I can&#39;t recall right now but that one about New York has always stuck in my mind. It seems like he predicted the end of the world in 3000 and something not sure...i had a video about all his prediction but lost it somewhere.


Nostrademeus (http://www.paganspath.com/meta/nostrdm2.htm)



In the year of the new century and nine months,
From the sky will come a great King of Terror
The sky will burn at forty-five degrees.
Fire approaches the great new city

Does Nostradamus describe the first nuclear target? In this verse he gives the longitude at 45 degrees, and we know whenever he spoke of a new city he was referring to a city in the new world. Scholars agree, this could only be New York. In this time of tension between the world&#39;s UN peace keepers in the Mid-East and the UN inspectors in Iraq, it does seem likely that the UN building in N.Y. could become a target.

Update:
Was this a prophecy of the weapons burning toward the city, or the city itself in flames? Could this describe the planes fiery engines, filled with fuel to create the largest explosion on impact? Osama bin Laden is definitely a King of Terror, not to mention the timing.

Near the gates and within the cities
there will be two scourges the like of which was never seen,
famine within plague, people put out by steel,
crying to the great immortal God for relief.

Update:
With the events of September 11, 2001, this quatrain becomes much clearer. Within 2 cities (New York and Washington DC), two scourges the like of which have never been seen. Until this time, no one has dared use a plan as a bomb. The people put out by steel is clearly the affects of the escape by many when the twin towers fell. After this event many Americans certainly did turn to their faith to find solace and relief.

A new war is coming, that&#39;s evident by all news accounts and threats. Sadly, as rescuers fought to free more victims in New York, their efforts added oxygen to burning embers which reignited into flames. The city continued to burn long after most thought the fires were extinguished. Could this line be referring to these rescue efforts? Or is this yet another event yet to come upon or after the President succumbs?

[Fantum309]

I think it was just a bad earthquake in a country that didn&#39;t have the forethought to be prepared for earthquakes, like say, California, where when they construct buildings, they plan for earthquakes. (I hope that is as clear as mud?) :unsure:

[SALvation]

Funny I was just watching a special on Nostradamous last night. They explained last night that his prediction of New York was actually a hoax. He never wrote any of those quatrains about New York, the two brothers, or a city of fire. The people that made them up got the dates wrong. Makes for a good story though.

[MANSON]

Yeah makes you wonder about it all. Who ever wrote that part about New York wrote it before any of that ever happened so someone did a good job&#33;&#33; hehe

[EXEcution]

Originally posted by Dark Reign+Dec 27 2003, 11:43 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Dark Reign @ Dec 27 2003, 11:43 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by DaRkAgent@Dec 27 2003, 01:30 PM

Originally posted by Dark Reign@Dec 27 2003, 02:47 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-OUTLAWS Dan2@Dec 27 2003, 06:43 AM
Tragic. When major faultlines are heavily populated this seems inevitable. :(
Especially in the third-world countries. :(
You mean "developing countries".
And yes it&#39;s very sad so mnay had to lose their lives.
No. I mean third-world countries.
You can call them "developing" countries if you want, but that doesn&#39;t change the fact that their still poor. :rolleyes: [/b][/quote]
But we don&#39;t want to break off contact with these "poor" countries. :oooo:

[Dark Reign]

Originally posted by DaRkAgent+Dec 27 2003, 07:39 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (DaRkAgent @ Dec 27 2003, 07:39 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by Dark Reign@Dec 27 2003, 11:43 AM

Originally posted by DaRkAgent@Dec 27 2003, 01:30 PM

Originally posted by Dark Reign@Dec 27 2003, 02:47 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-OUTLAWS Dan2@Dec 27 2003, 06:43 AM
Tragic. When major faultlines are heavily populated this seems inevitable. :(
Especially in the third-world countries. :(
You mean "developing countries".
And yes it&#39;s very sad so mnay had to lose their lives.
No. I mean third-world countries.
You can call them "developing" countries if you want, but that doesn&#39;t change the fact that their still poor. :rolleyes:
But we don&#39;t want to break off contact with these "poor" countries. :oooo: [/b][/quote]
Break off contact? What?

[UZI]

It is very sad news. Fantum has a good point. A 6.5 killed two people in CA and a 6.3 kills over 20,000 in Iran. Usually poor people living in poor housing conditions.

Our newpaper listed the 10 deadliest quakes since 1902

China in 1976 255,000 killed
China in 1920 200,000 killed
China in 1927 200,000 killed
Japan in 1923 143,000 killed
Turkmenistan 1948 110,000 killed
Italy 1908 70,000+ killed
China 1932 70,000 killed
Peru 1970 66,000 killed
Iran 1990 40,000+ killed
Pakistan 1953 30,000+ killed

I lived in CA just long enough to become very scared of earthquakes. They come without warning.

[EXEcution]

Originally posted by Dark Reign+Dec 27 2003, 03:42 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Dark Reign @ Dec 27 2003, 03:42 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by DaRkAgent@Dec 27 2003, 07:39 PM

Originally posted by Dark Reign@Dec 27 2003, 11:43 AM

Originally posted by DaRkAgent@Dec 27 2003, 01:30 PM

Originally posted by Dark Reign@Dec 27 2003, 02:47 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-OUTLAWS Dan2@Dec 27 2003, 06:43 AM
Tragic. When major faultlines are heavily populated this seems inevitable. :(
Especially in the third-world countries. :(
You mean "developing countries".
And yes it&#39;s very sad so mnay had to lose their lives.
No. I mean third-world countries.
You can call them "developing" countries if you want, but that doesn&#39;t change the fact that their still poor. :rolleyes:
But we don&#39;t want to break off contact with these "poor" countries. :oooo:
Break off contact? What? [/b][/quote]
You know oil n&#39;stuff.

[Thundarr]

Originally posted by UZI@Dec 27 2003, 03:10 PM
It is very sad news. Fantum has a good point. A 6.5 killed two people in CA and a 6.3 kills over 20,000 in Iran. Usually poor people living in poor housing conditions.

Our newpaper listed the 10 deadliest quakes since 1902

China in 1976 255,000 killed
China in 1920 200,000 killed
China in 1927 200,000 killed
Japan in 1923 143,000 killed
Turkmenistan 1948 110,000 killed
Italy 1908 70,000+ killed
China 1932 70,000 killed
Peru 1970 66,000 killed
Iran 1990 40,000+ killed
Pakistan 1953 30,000+ killed

I lived in CA just long enough to become very scared of earthquakes. They come without warning.
I think I heard that it was a very historic area with a ton of very old architecture, etc so they may not have wanted to update it to ruin it&#39;s historic significance... But, now look what happened&#33; :blink: What a shame&#33;&#33;&#33; :(