Behind Blue Eyes

[PJ'l_Master]

I like the new one better to be completely honest. That doesnt mean that i hate the old version though.

Also, who sings the new version so i can buy the CD?

[Nitro]

and who is this by...?

[PJ'l_Master]

i dunno...good question :hmmm:

[PJ'l_Master]

a google search said that the old version is sung by: The Who, and that the new version is sung by: Limp Bizkit<------suprised me

[Caged Anger]

i&#39;ve never heard either one, i think. but in my opinion, most songs are best the first time

[PJ'l_Master]

Originally posted by Caged Anger@Mar 14 2004, 01:55 AM
i&#39;ve never heard either one, i think. but in my opinion, most songs are best the first time
normally that is my opinion also but the new one is just so powerful and moving

[unforgiven]

new one rox...and it is sang by limp :wootrock:

[BobtheCkroach]

I personally think that Limp ruined it - I think the Who did it far better. I hate the way Limp added that downtime where he said "l..i..m..p" blah blah. and it sounds like darth vader is breathing too. I loved the Who&#39;s version FAR more.

[PJ'l_Master]

Originally posted by BobtheCkroach@Mar 14 2004, 03:41 AM
I personally think that Limp ruined it - I think the Who did it far better. I hate the way Limp added that downtime where he said "l..i..m..p" blah blah. and it sounds like darth vader is breathing too. I loved the Who&#39;s version FAR more.
*cough FREAK cough*

:shifty:

[solid snake295]

i agree with trogdor :P
limp bizkit ruins all the songs they cover.
and the who rocks :wootrock:

[Pure_Evil]

There&#39;s absolutely no way musically that anyone can say Limp did it better. The Who has far more tallent and Daultry sings it like it matters, not some techno crap :wave:

[BobtheCkroach]

Pure, you&#39;re a Uber smart dude&#33;

[skabzvice]

I actually like the new Limp bizkit cd while their 2nd and 3rd were completely crap. Their only good cd&#39;s are their first and their newest. I personally think that the version they did of the behind blue eyes is crappy...I mean, it might be good if they had come up with it...but it doesnt compare to the old version.

[Thundarr]

Originally posted by Pure_Evil@Mar 13 2004, 11:06 PM
There&#39;s absolutely no way musically that anyone can say Limp did it better. The Who has far more tallent and Daultry sings it like it matters, not some techno crap :wave:
Amen, Pure... The Who rocks&#33;&#33;&#33; :jammin: :thumbs:

[Grimmy]

Originally posted by Thundarr+Mar 15 2004, 11:24 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Thundarr @ Mar 15 2004, 11:24 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Pure_Evil@Mar 13 2004, 11:06 PM
There&#39;s absolutely no way musically that anyone can say Limp did it better. The Who has far more tallent and Daultry sings it like it matters, not some techno crap :wave:
Amen, Pure... The Who rocks&#33;&#33;&#33; :jammin: :thumbs: [/b][/quote]
LIMP BIZKIT PWNS JOO&#33; :P :jammin:

[OUTLAWS WHOCARES]

Fred Dirst or however you spell it is nothing but a poor excuse of a Tattoo artist that got lucky.
In RL the guy is a tool.

[Speedsweeper]

The Who used to be a great british rock band.

No one, let alone Limp Bizkit can cover thier songs properly.