PDA

View Full Version : 3dmark03



ME BIGGD01
02-13-2003, 09:04 AM
anyone get the download? i have been trying all day and it seems impossible.

Mr Clean
02-13-2003, 03:14 PM
What is it?

SALvation
02-13-2003, 03:19 PM
A benchmarking program for your video card/PC.

Sauron
02-13-2003, 03:20 PM
Originally posted by ME BIGGD01@Feb 13 2003, 10:04 AM
anyone get the download? i have been trying all day and it seems impossible.
Bain got it but unfortunately she can't remember form what site :(

Darthvim
02-13-2003, 08:17 PM
i got it :)

i have 833 points ...

Dissectional
02-13-2003, 08:34 PM
I'm not going to get it until I get a new video card. That is the only thing that is holding me back.

OUTLAWS The Machine
02-13-2003, 08:37 PM
I finally got connected to a site to download it. It took 2.5 hours because of the slow download speed. :bandhead:

OUTLAWS Behind You?
02-13-2003, 10:01 PM
I thought the d/l was slow to, but it only took me 14 minutes...I guess it's just a timing thing. I have in the past killed a d/l that was going to slow and started it up again. Sometimes this would get it to d/l at normal speeds. Sometimes not. :angel:

OUTLAWS WHOCARES
02-13-2003, 10:35 PM
I got it.
But not too sure if I want to install it.
With my video card would I beneifit from Direct X9?

ME BIGGD01
02-14-2003, 02:50 AM
i installed it and update video card drivers to 3.1 and installed the dx9. no problems.

Death-Dude
02-14-2003, 03:07 AM
Originally posted by ME BIGGD01@Feb 13 2003, 03:04 AM
anyone get the download? i have been trying all day and it seems impossible.
Tell you the truth, with the crappy times/rates I was getting, I decided to let the rush pass and get it later. I did put DX 9 on, though. I was going to run the old 3DMark, but I saw a post in another forum that said it wouldn't run - needed 8.1. DX is usually very backward compatible, so I'll have to check that out.

Sirc
02-14-2003, 04:21 AM
Originally posted by Death-Dude+Feb 13 2003, 10:07 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Death-Dude @ Feb 13 2003, 10:07 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--ME BIGGD01@Feb 13 2003, 03:04 AM
anyone get the download?&nbsp; i have been trying all day and it seems impossible.
Tell you the truth, with the crappy times/rates I was getting, I decided to let the rush pass and get it later. I did put DX 9 on, though. I was going to run the old 3DMark, but I saw a post in another forum that said it wouldn&#39;t run - needed 8.1. DX is usually very backward compatible, so I&#39;ll have to check that out. [/b][/quote]
I installed DX9 and it managed to shave about 100 points off my DX8.1 score. :rolleyes:

ME BIGGD01
02-14-2003, 05:26 AM
sircy do you have dx9 card? it might slow you down if not. i was not happy with the overall bechmark as far as 140 mb download. i guess i was expecting more.

Death-Dude
02-17-2003, 11:34 PM
ATI&#39;s Response (http://hwextreme.com/reviews/misc/3dresponse/)

ATI has issued a statement about the new 3DMark.

Mitchyl
02-18-2003, 05:39 PM
Toms hardware has a little blurb about the new 3Dmark as well. I tried it out last night and got a measly 875. I don&#39;t know how that compares as their comparison server was all messed up when I tried it last night. My system is an XP2000+ with a GF3 TI200. Anyone else have results they&#39;d like to share?

DE/Mitchyl

Sauron
02-18-2003, 05:43 PM
Bain has the same score on the same type of GFX card/cpu

Grimmy
02-18-2003, 05:44 PM
Originally posted by Mitchyl@Feb 18 2003, 12:39 PM
Toms hardware has a little blurb about the new 3Dmark as well. I tried it out last night and got a measly 875. I don&#39;t know how that compares as their comparison server was all messed up when I tried it last night. My system is an XP2000+ with a GF3 TI200. Anyone else have results they&#39;d like to share?

DE/Mitchyl
I know if you upgrade your vid card, you will score a lot better. I scored an 880 my first time, on this dell 1.9GHz and I have th ATI Radeon 9700 Pro, and just installed the card and reran 3dMark, and scored 3030. :wootrock:

Death-Dude
02-21-2003, 10:28 PM
Originally posted by Grimmy+Feb 18 2003, 11:44 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Grimmy @ Feb 18 2003, 11:44 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Mitchyl@Feb 18 2003, 12:39 PM
Toms hardware has a little blurb about the new 3Dmark as well.&nbsp; I tried it out last night and got a measly 875.&nbsp; I don&#39;t know how that compares as their comparison server was all messed up when I tried it last night.&nbsp; My system is an XP2000+ with a GF3 TI200.&nbsp; Anyone else have results they&#39;d like to share?

DE/Mitchyl
I know if you upgrade your vid card, you will score a lot better. I scored an 880 my first time, on this dell 1.9GHz and I have th ATI Radeon 9700 Pro, and just installed the card and reran 3dMark, and scored 3030. :wootrock: [/b][/quote]
THe 9700 is the card for this test, I got a 1467. In the flight tests, I got pretty decent frames, but in the Battle for Proxycon and the chick slaying trolls, and the troll jump (which I love&#33;) my frames went to single digits, and sometimes single digit...as in 1&#33; Depressing&#33;

Morpheus
02-21-2003, 10:44 PM
Just remember&#33; 3DMark 2002 SE is my turf&#33;


16454 points&#33; :devil:

Deleted pic, but there&#39;s a pic of it in off topic.

ME BIGGD01
03-08-2003, 06:21 AM
what did you do to get that score??? thats amazing. are you o/cing what card?

Slice
03-08-2003, 06:51 AM
Originally posted by ME BIGGD01@Mar 8 2003, 01:21 AM
what did you do to get that score??? thats amazing. are you o/cing what card?
He didn&#39;t get it in 2003. ;) He got it in 2002, which doesn&#39;t even work right with direct x 9

Grimmy
03-08-2003, 06:53 AM
I was going to say some good jpeg editing :rofl:

Sirc
03-08-2003, 06:56 AM
Originally posted by Slice+Mar 8 2003, 01:51 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Slice @ Mar 8 2003, 01:51 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--ME BIGGD01@Mar 8 2003, 01:21 AM
what did you do to get that score???&nbsp; thats amazing.&nbsp; are you o/cing what card?
He didn&#39;t get it in 2003. ;) He got it in 2002, which doesn&#39;t even work right with direct x 9 [/b][/quote]
That&#39;s still an amazing score for 2002. Highest I&#39;ve seen. Are you saying that with DX9 the scores are invalid with 2002?

Slice
03-08-2003, 05:58 PM
Originally posted by OUTLAWS Sirc+Mar 8 2003, 01:56 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (OUTLAWS Sirc @ Mar 8 2003, 01:56 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by -Slice@Mar 8 2003, 01:51 AM
<!--QuoteBegin--ME BIGGD01@Mar 8 2003, 01:21 AM
what did you do to get that score???* thats amazing.* are you o/cing what card?
He didn&#39;t get it in 2003. ;) He got it in 2002, which doesn&#39;t even work right with direct x 9
That&#39;s still an amazing score for 2002. Highest I&#39;ve seen. Are you saying that with DX9 the scores are invalid with 2002? [/b][/quote]
My 2002 won&#39;t even run right. Don&#39;t know what the deal is, maybe I will try it again with the new drivers installed.

Morpheus
03-09-2003, 04:30 PM
BLAHAHA you&#39;re all wrong. :P


It&#39;s 2001 SE. :rolleyes:

Morpheus
03-09-2003, 04:31 PM
But it&#39;s still the third highest on the 3Dmark 2001 Se Pro (came with computer) resultbrowser in this country.


:wootrock: :jammin: :drink:

Morpheus
03-09-2003, 04:34 PM
But, I Overclocked the 9700 pro and water cooled it, right when it came out, so that might be why too.

Slice
03-09-2003, 06:34 PM
I could probably beat it. I got my 2001 to work yesterday and got a 15,800 with out overclocking anything. I will let you keep the throne for now though. ;) :P