The Da Vinci Code

[Die Hard]

Well I was lucky enough to go see the premier tonight.

I read the book yonks ago and it wasn't as good but movies based on books seldom are.

I won't spoil your enjoyment but all in all I thought it was a good, enthralling movie and would like to hear what the rest of you guys think after you've seen it.

It was nice to get to see a movie before you Americans. First time!! :D

[EXEcution]

LOL @ yonks ago!

Anyway I haven't seen the film yet but I am planning on it. TBH Tom Hanks isn't my favorite actor, but Ron Howard is a very good director and he is one of the few directors who can really bring out emotion in a scene.

[OUTLAWS Tip]

One fictional movie that I would have no interest in seeing. I don't go to the movies anyway so they won't miss me.
:D

On a side note, I don't think we will see Catholics around the world burning down buildings or rioting over this movie. People are allowed to have opinions and discussion is a good thing.
:P

[SALvation]

Wife and I are going tomorrow to see it.

[SASQUATCH]

I plan on to see it this weekend or on Monday. I read the book it's a good book and books always are so much better then the movies but Ron Howard is good director and I do like Tom Hanks he has come a long way.

[NastyDawg]

One fictional movie that I would have no interest in seeing. I don't go to the movies anyway so they won't miss me.
:D

On a side note, I don't think we will see Catholics around the world burning down buildings or rioting over this movie. People are allowed to have opinions and discussion is a good thing.
:P

Ditto on both points, but it sure does have a lot of people up in arms!

[ME BIGGD01]

looks like it's a long boring movie that sux's according to these reviews.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/da_vinci_code/


I would imagine the DVD will have all the cut outs and therefore I will most likely wait for that if I do see it. I hate long boring movies in a theater.

[SASQUATCH]

I will make my own judgment because those Critics on that web site I never heard of them. Only person I trust to even consider is Joe Siegel and there is one on channel 13 for got his name. Bigg’s you and me have different taste for example I like 2001 Odyssey and I would bet you would hate it and find it boring. Hehehehe:D

[EXEcution]

This review seems pretty intelligent. Taken from a poster from IMDB.com.

"Screened overnight for Australian media.

Four words - wrong star, wrong director.

Hanks and Howards best work, both together or separately, have been when they embrace intrinsically American values in their films. All their most memorable movies have involved individuals overcoming hardship through an unshakable belief in love and courage, usually set against an outwardly US-centric interpretation of events. Think Apollo 13, Forrest Gump, Cinderella Man, Saving Private Ryan - all fine films, all centred on an American hero rising above their circumstance.

What is conspicuously absent from either man's resume is a European-set, religious-themed mystery thriller. Having sat through their arduous, laborious adaptation of Dan Brown's novel, I can now see why.

The plot is total bunkum - a hodgepodge of "what ifs" and "oh my god" moments spun on the ludicrous premise that Leonardo Da Vinci had some sort of insight into the life of Christ - but loopy story lines have not stopped many films from being enjoyable.

What makes The Da Vinci Code so deathly dull is the heavy-handed, oh-so-serious approach Howard applies to the material. Combining with his cinematographer to give the film a sleepy nocturnal feel (not so clever given the 150min running time), Howard's film is just a constant flow of expository clues that fail to create any tension or engender his leads with any human qualities. Even for those that haven't read the book, a couple of obligatory 'big twists' in the story are very obvious from early-on.

Hanks (looking more like Jim Belushi than ever) and McKellen blather on and on and on about knights and saints and symbols and God as if they were giving a lecture at some Ivy-league school for the supernatural; Audrey Tautou is lovely but has little to do in a role that is plot- not character-driven. Jean Reno ambles thru another of his token French cop parts (he was better in the Pink Panther); Paul Bettany's evil albino Silas at least got some audience reaction, though giggles and guffaws were probably not what he was hoping for.

Whatever sense of fun and excitement the book provided is fully-drained from this adaptation. Come credit time, I had the realisation that all this hokey, airport-novel religious hooey and B-movie plotting would've made for a great X-files episode in that series heyday. As the end-product of a publishing phenomenon and carrying the tag "Years Most-Anticipated", its a boring dud."

I'm still gonna see it so I can draw my own conclusions. :D