PDA

View Full Version : Mom indicted for hiring stripper for son



Nitro
02-01-2007, 06:48 PM
Mom indicted for hiring stripper for son

NASHVILLE, Tenn. - A mother faces criminal charges after she hired a stripper to dance at her 16-year-old son’s birthday party.

Anette Pharris, 34, has been indicted by a grand jury on charges of contributing to the delinquency of a minor and involving a minor in obscene acts. The boy’s father, the stripper and two others also face charges.

“I tried to do something special for my son,” Pharris said. “It didn’t harm him.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8022400/

FUS1ON
02-01-2007, 06:58 PM
Hmmm lets see ..... I'm a 16 year old male and do I want a stripper or a clown? That poor clown is going to go broke. :D

Caged Anger
02-01-2007, 07:52 PM
*smacks head against wall

Why is it any business of the courts if the mom gives the son a stripper for his birthday? He didn't object, the mom didn't object, I'm sure the stripper didn't object, and no one else at the party objected. It was the freakin drug store photo developers that stuck their noses where they didn't belong

OUTLAWS Tip
02-01-2007, 08:11 PM
Digital camera and printer for the the win.
:P

Hmm, no sex involved? Guess she couldn't take him to a nude beach either.
:rolleyes:

Pure_Evil
02-01-2007, 08:25 PM
lol, GG mom! wonder if she's single :D

Asian Invasian
02-02-2007, 06:53 AM
stupid, none of the courts business

OUTLAWS CHICO
02-02-2007, 07:44 AM
The only problem is the other Kids underage that I can see. Unless the parents where given consent from their parents then everything should be ok. In my opinion the government has gotten to where they want to be able to raise our kids the way they want us too. Alot of the kids know that the hands of the parents are tied and abuse the parents to no end.

He Is Legend
02-02-2007, 09:13 AM
haha . his parents owned .

Mad Fox
02-02-2007, 02:37 PM
I think that its inappropriate for a child to have a stripper. But it seems as if they could do what they want. And i think that it may be the drug stores policy to turn in suspicious photos. And no matter which way you spin it the kids were underage and that breaks the law.

NastyDawg
02-02-2007, 03:19 PM
Damn lucky kid.

Nitro
02-02-2007, 09:17 PM
I think that its inappropriate for a child to have a stripper. But it seems as if they could do what they want. And i think that it may be the drug stores policy to turn in suspicious photos. And no matter which way you spin it the kids were underage and that breaks the law.

When you're 16, you're a man, you not a freakin child. Most of everyone I know has had an active sex life since 16 so to pretend like we're children is stupid and idiotic. I guess people in Congress are too busy sucking off little boys to realize at least a tad of logic these days. This law is completely stupid and just cuz its the law doesn't mean you need to obey it, unless you want to be a good little socialist slave :rolleyes:

Nick
02-02-2007, 09:51 PM
lol

the older you get ... the older you consider people as children :P

beign sexually active does not make you an adult...

but I dont think the courts have ANYTHING to say in this case...

are they gonna arrest parents if their kid watches a R rated movie ?

the US is 3 times as severe than Canada in almost all crimes...

kill someone here and with good behaviour youll be out in less than 10 years..

in US they kill you or you never see the sun again...

I saw a show where many drug pushers that got the 3 strikes can get life without parole...

import 3 tons of coke to Canada and youll get 5 years...

get caught with simple possesion of weed over here and they will confiscate it... in US your in DEEP CACA !!

maybe Canada is too lax... but I wouldnt want to be cought for anything in US...

NastyDawg
02-02-2007, 09:55 PM
Note to self, ......if your going to do a crime do it in Canada.

Mad Fox
02-03-2007, 02:06 AM
Nitro under the law until you are 18 you are a minor - aka a child. And jsut because you are sexually active doesnt make it right.

Nitro
02-03-2007, 03:41 AM
Nitro under the law until you are 18 you are a minor - aka a child. And jsut because you are sexually active doesnt make it right.

The law is WRONG. Simple as that.

If you are physically able to have a child, it is your responsibility to make the right decisions. You are not a child anymore if you cna have your own child, I don't care what any stupid group says. If you can have a kid, you're not a kid anymore. Western society is so deluded...

NightBreed
02-03-2007, 04:07 AM
Ehhhh...at 16 you don't know what to do with it anyway...:D it'd just be a 2-pump chump..:rolleyes:

Mad Fox
02-03-2007, 04:13 AM
The law is WRONG. Simple as that.

If you are physically able to have a child, it is your responsibility to make the right decisions. You are not a child anymore if you cna have your own child, I don't care what any stupid group says. If you can have a kid, you're not a kid anymore. Western society is so deluded...

Eh, some people caould have children as young as 12. So that description is soso. But I dont think at 16 i was that mature. But the law is the law and until it is altered people who are in charge of enforcement must follow it.

Nitro
02-03-2007, 04:22 AM
I knew someone who had a child when she was 12. She became a mother.
Do you believe that mother, who now has a child, is still a child? Think about it, it does not make sense if you think logically. Have you forgotten what it is to be 16? You would love having a stripper for your birthday, cmon, admit it :D

Mad Fox
02-03-2007, 04:31 AM
I knew someone who had a child when she was 12. She became a mother.
Do you believe that mother, who now has a child, is still a child? Think about it, it does not make sense if you think logically. Have you forgotten what it is to be 16? You would love having a stripper for your birthday, cmon, admit it :D

Children having children is not good. I think that your a child until at least 17. If I was 16 I wouldnt be having a party with my mother around.

OUTLAWS Tip
02-03-2007, 05:06 AM
Children having children is not good. I think that your a child until at least 17. If I was 16 I wouldnt be having a party with my mother around.

You would if she hired a stripper!!
:D

Mad Fox
02-03-2007, 03:24 PM
You would if she hired a stripper!!
:D


Just the thought of my mother hiring a tripper is crazy. I'd be lucky if she bought the cake.

Caged Anger
02-03-2007, 05:08 PM
oh be nice, I know for a fact that every year you get a nice party from your folks :P albeit minus the strippers....

PuRe AnGeL
02-03-2007, 05:54 PM
A girl somewhere in UK had a child at 11. Under the law she is STILL a child, but if i went through all the pain of having a baby - i'd HAVE to be a lot maturer. So i'd class myself as an adult.
About the stripper thing, his MUM hired him a stripper? how cringey is that.. But i guess he was 16, and over here [ not sure where it went on ] at 16 you can make your own desicions about sex. So you'd probably get away with it - it's not like it was actually sex.
i also kinda agree with Nitro, that when you can have a child and when you're ready i think it's up to you what you do; have a child or not. It's your body, basicly.

Mad Fox
02-03-2007, 06:20 PM
oh be nice, I know for a fact that every year you get a nice party from your folks :P albeit minus the strippers....

yeah my grandmothers come thats it. Imagine their faces if a stripper arrived.:eek: LOL :rofl: